[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200501144051.aotbofpyuy5tqcfp@steredhat>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 16:40:51 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vhost: vsock: kick send_pkt worker once device is
started
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:38:40PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> Ning Bo reported an abnormal 2-second gap when booting Kata container [1].
> The unconditional timeout was caused by VSOCK_DEFAULT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT of
> connecting from the client side. The vhost vsock client tries to connect
> an initializing virtio vsock server.
>
> The abnormal flow looks like:
> host-userspace vhost vsock guest vsock
> ============== =========== ============
> connect() --------> vhost_transport_send_pkt_work() initializing
> | vq->private_data==NULL
> | will not be queued
> V
> schedule_timeout(2s)
> vhost_vsock_start() <--------- device ready
> set vq->private_data
>
> wait for 2s and failed
> connect() again vq->private_data!=NULL recv connecting pkt
>
> Details:
> 1. Host userspace sends a connect pkt, at that time, guest vsock is under
> initializing, hence the vhost_vsock_start has not been called. So
> vq->private_data==NULL, and the pkt is not been queued to send to guest
> 2. Then it sleeps for 2s
> 3. After guest vsock finishes initializing, vq->private_data is set
> 4. When host userspace wakes up after 2s, send connecting pkt again,
> everything is fine.
>
> As suggested by Stefano Garzarella, this fixes it by additional kicking the
> send_pkt worker in vhost_vsock_start once the virtio device is started. This
> makes the pending pkt sent again.
>
> After this patch, kata-runtime (with vsock enabled) boot time is reduced
> from 3s to 1s on a ThunderX2 arm64 server.
>
> [1] https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/1917
>
> Reported-by: Ning Bo <n.b@...e.com>
> Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
> ---
> v2: new solution suggested by Stefano Garzarella
>
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Stefano
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index e36aaf9ba7bd..0716a9cdffee 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -543,6 +543,11 @@ static int vhost_vsock_start(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
> mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> }
>
> + /* Some packets may have been queued before the device was started,
> + * let's kick the send worker to send them.
> + */
> + vhost_work_queue(&vsock->dev, &vsock->send_pkt_work);
> +
> mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> return 0;
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists