netdev - [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] devlink: factor out building a snapshot notification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200501164042.1430604-2-kuba@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri,  1 May 2020 09:40:40 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...nulli.us
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        jacob.e.keller@...el.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] devlink: factor out building a snapshot notification

We'll need to send snapshot info back on the socket
which requested a snapshot to be created. Factor out
constructing a snapshot description from the broadcast
notification code.

v3: new patch

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
 net/core/devlink.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index 9f0af8931a9c..92afb85bad89 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -3716,24 +3716,26 @@ static int devlink_nl_region_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
 	return err;
 }
 
-static void devlink_nl_region_notify(struct devlink_region *region,
-				     struct devlink_snapshot *snapshot,
-				     enum devlink_command cmd)
+static struct sk_buff *
+devlink_nl_region_notify_build(struct devlink_region *region,
+			       struct devlink_snapshot *snapshot,
+			       enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid, u32 seq)
 {
 	struct devlink *devlink = region->devlink;
 	struct sk_buff *msg;
 	void *hdr;
 	int err;
 
-	WARN_ON(cmd != DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_NEW && cmd != DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_DEL);
 
 	msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!msg)
-		return;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, 0, 0, &devlink_nl_family, 0, cmd);
-	if (!hdr)
+	hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, portid, seq, &devlink_nl_family, 0, cmd);
+	if (!hdr) {
+		err = -EMSGSIZE;
 		goto out_free_msg;
+	}
 
 	err = devlink_nl_put_handle(msg, devlink);
 	if (err)
@@ -3757,15 +3759,30 @@ static void devlink_nl_region_notify(struct devlink_region *region,
 	}
 	genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
 
-	genlmsg_multicast_netns(&devlink_nl_family, devlink_net(devlink),
-				msg, 0, DEVLINK_MCGRP_CONFIG, GFP_KERNEL);
-
-	return;
+	return msg;
 
 out_cancel_msg:
 	genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
 out_free_msg:
 	nlmsg_free(msg);
+	return ERR_PTR(err);
+}
+
+static void devlink_nl_region_notify(struct devlink_region *region,
+				     struct devlink_snapshot *snapshot,
+				     enum devlink_command cmd)
+{
+	struct devlink *devlink = region->devlink;
+	struct sk_buff *msg;
+
+	WARN_ON(cmd != DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_NEW && cmd != DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_DEL);
+
+	msg = devlink_nl_region_notify_build(region, snapshot, cmd, 0, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(msg))
+		return;
+
+	genlmsg_multicast_netns(&devlink_nl_family, devlink_net(devlink),
+				msg, 0, DEVLINK_MCGRP_CONFIG, GFP_KERNEL);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.4