netdev - [Patch net] atm: fix a UAF in lec_arp_clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200501181109.14542-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri,  1 May 2020 11:11:08 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Gengming Liu <l.dmxcsnsbh@...il.com>
Subject: [Patch net] atm: fix a UAF in lec_arp_clear_vccs()

Gengming reported a UAF in lec_arp_clear_vccs(),
where we add a vcc socket to an entry in a per-device
list but free the socket without removing it from the
list when vcc->dev is NULL.

We need to call lec_vcc_close() to search and remove
those entries contain the vcc being destroyed. This can
be done by calling vcc->push(vcc, NULL) unconditionally
in vcc_destroy_socket().

Another issue discovered by Gengming's reproducer is
the vcc->dev may point to the static device lecatm_dev,
for which we don't need to register/unregister device,
so we can just check for vcc->dev->ops->owner.

Reported-by: Gengming Liu <l.dmxcsnsbh@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
---
 net/atm/common.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/atm/common.c b/net/atm/common.c
index 0ce530af534d..8575f5d52087 100644
--- a/net/atm/common.c
+++ b/net/atm/common.c
@@ -177,18 +177,18 @@ static void vcc_destroy_socket(struct sock *sk)
 
 	set_bit(ATM_VF_CLOSE, &vcc->flags);
 	clear_bit(ATM_VF_READY, &vcc->flags);
-	if (vcc->dev) {
-		if (vcc->dev->ops->close)
-			vcc->dev->ops->close(vcc);
-		if (vcc->push)
-			vcc->push(vcc, NULL); /* atmarpd has no push */
-		module_put(vcc->owner);
-
-		while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) {
-			atm_return(vcc, skb->truesize);
-			kfree_skb(skb);
-		}
+	if (vcc->dev && vcc->dev->ops->close)
+		vcc->dev->ops->close(vcc);
+	if (vcc->push)
+		vcc->push(vcc, NULL); /* atmarpd has no push */
+	module_put(vcc->owner);
+
+	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) {
+		atm_return(vcc, skb->truesize);
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+	}
 
+	if (vcc->dev && vcc->dev->ops->owner) {
 		module_put(vcc->dev->ops->owner);
 		atm_dev_put(vcc->dev);
 	}
-- 
2.26.1