[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQK0Jtr3+nvOgWxmtBD2SQE2YhYbNJPMWw-7n219vy_4+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 12:53:37 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf: bpf_{g,s}etsockopt for struct bpf_sock_addr
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 11:33 AM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > Currently, bpf_getsockopt and bpf_setsockopt helpers operate on the
> > 'struct bpf_sock_ops' context in BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS program.
> > Let's generalize them and make them available for 'struct bpf_sock_addr'.
> > That way, in the future, we can allow those helpers in more places.
> >
> > As an example, let's expose those 'struct bpf_sock_addr' based helpers to
> > BPF_CGROUP_INET{4,6}_CONNECT hooks. That way we can override CC before the
> > connection is made.
> >
> > v3:
> > * Expose custom helpers for bpf_sock_addr context instead of doing
> > generic bpf_sock argument (as suggested by Daniel). Even with
> > try_socket_lock that doesn't sleep we have a problem where context sk
> > is already locked and socket lock is non-nestable.
> >
> > v2:
> > * s/BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT/BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS/
> >
> > Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> > Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> > ---
>
> To bad we had to fall back to ctx here.
>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Applied. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists