netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ethtool: Add support for 100Gbps per lane link modes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200502150857.GC142589@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sat, 2 May 2020 17:08:57 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Meir Lichtinger <meirl@...lanox.com>,
        Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ethtool: Add support for 100Gbps per lane
 link modes

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 04:41:05PM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Meir Lichtinger <meirl@...lanox.com>
> 
> Define 100G, 200G and 400G link modes using 100Gbps per lane
> 
> Signed-off-by: Meir Lichtinger <meirl@...lanox.com>
> CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Reviewed-by: Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c   | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  net/ethtool/common.c         | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  net/ethtool/linkmodes.c      | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c
> index 66b8c61ca74c..a71fc8b18973 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>  
>  const char *phy_speed_to_str(int speed)
>  {
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS != 75,
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS != 90,
>  		"Enum ethtool_link_mode_bit_indices and phylib are out of sync. "
>  		"If a speed or mode has been added please update phy_speed_to_str "
>  		"and the PHY settings array.\n");
> @@ -78,12 +78,22 @@ static const struct phy_setting settings[] = {
>  	PHY_SETTING( 400000, FULL, 400000baseLR8_ER8_FR8_Full	),
>  	PHY_SETTING( 400000, FULL, 400000baseDR8_Full		),
>  	PHY_SETTING( 400000, FULL, 400000baseSR8_Full		),
> +	PHY_SETTING( 400000, FULL, 400000baseCR4_Full		),
> +	PHY_SETTING( 400000, FULL, 400000baseKR4_Full		),
> +	PHY_SETTING( 400000, FULL, 400000baseLR4_ER4_FR4_Full	),

Hi Mier, Saeed.

Could you explain this last one? Seems unlikely this is a 12 pair link
mode. So i assume it is four pair which can do LR4, ER4 or FR4? Can
you connect a 400000baseLR4 to a 400000baseER4 with a 10Km cable and
it work? How do you know you have connected a 400000baseLR4 to a
400000baseER4 with a 40Km and it is not expected to work, when looking
at ethtool? I assume the EEPROM contents tell you if the module is
LR4, ER4, or FR4?

     Andrew