lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 02 May 2020 16:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/13] net/smc: first part of add link
 processing as SMC client

From: Karsten Graul <>
Date: Sat,  2 May 2020 14:35:40 +0200

> +static void smc_llc_process_cli_add_link(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
> +{
> +	struct smc_llc_qentry *qentry;
> +
> +	qentry = smc_llc_flow_qentry_clr(&lgr->llc_flow_lcl);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
> +	smc_llc_cli_add_link(qentry->link, qentry);
> +	mutex_unlock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
> +}
> +
>  /* worker to process an add link message */

You must make sure the compilation succeeds without warnings after each
and every patch in your patch series.

Here you are adding a static function which is completely unused so I know
the compiler will warn without even build testing this patch.

And this was done in the previous patch series as well, which I will
fix up right now:

net/smc/smc_llc.c:544:12: warning: ‘smc_llc_alloc_alt_link’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 static int smc_llc_alloc_alt_link(struct smc_link_group *lgr,

I get the feeling, seeing all of this, that you are splitting up the
patch set properly only because I firmly required you to do so.  This
effort looks half hearted and being done reluctantly.

Please clean all of this up and submit these changes cleanly and
properly, thank you.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists