[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04606444-900f-53d3-4206-5f26cc9bb42d@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 15:56:39 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Po Liu <po.liu@....com>,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang@....com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
Christian Herber <christian.herber@....com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
vlad@...lov.dev, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: dsa: export dsa_slave_dev_check and
dsa_slave_to_port
On 5/3/2020 3:47 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 01:45, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/3/2020 2:10 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>>> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>>>
>>> To be able to perform mirroring and redirection through tc-flower
>>> offloads (the implementation of which is given raw access to the
>>> flow_cls_offload structure), switch drivers need to be able to call
>>> these functions on act->dev.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes from RFC:
>>> None.
>>>
>>> include/net/dsa.h | 2 ++
>>> net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 8 --------
>>> net/dsa/slave.c | 9 +++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
>>> index fb3f9222f2a1..62beaa4c234e 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
>>> @@ -739,6 +739,8 @@ int dsa_port_get_phy_strings(struct dsa_port *dp, uint8_t *data);
>>> int dsa_port_get_ethtool_phy_stats(struct dsa_port *dp, uint64_t *data);
>>> int dsa_port_get_phy_sset_count(struct dsa_port *dp);
>>> void dsa_port_phylink_mac_change(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, bool up);
>>> +bool dsa_slave_dev_check(const struct net_device *dev);
>>> +struct dsa_port *dsa_slave_to_port(const struct net_device *dev);
>>>
>>> struct dsa_tag_driver {
>>> const struct dsa_device_ops *ops;
>>> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>>> index 6d9a1ef65fa0..32bf570fd71c 100644
>>> --- a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>>> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>>> @@ -173,19 +173,11 @@ extern const struct dsa_device_ops notag_netdev_ops;
>>> void dsa_slave_mii_bus_init(struct dsa_switch *ds);
>>> int dsa_slave_create(struct dsa_port *dp);
>>> void dsa_slave_destroy(struct net_device *slave_dev);
>>> -bool dsa_slave_dev_check(const struct net_device *dev);
>>> int dsa_slave_suspend(struct net_device *slave_dev);
>>> int dsa_slave_resume(struct net_device *slave_dev);
>>> int dsa_slave_register_notifier(void);
>>> void dsa_slave_unregister_notifier(void);
>>>
>>> -static inline struct dsa_port *dsa_slave_to_port(const struct net_device *dev)
>>> -{
>>> - struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> -
>>> - return p->dp;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static inline struct net_device *
>>> dsa_slave_to_master(const struct net_device *dev)
>>> {
>>> diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
>>> index ba8bf90dc0cc..4eeb5b47ef99 100644
>>> --- a/net/dsa/slave.c
>>> +++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
>>> @@ -62,6 +62,14 @@ static int dsa_slave_get_iflink(const struct net_device *dev)
>>> return dsa_slave_to_master(dev)->ifindex;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +struct dsa_port *dsa_slave_to_port(const struct net_device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> +
>>> + return p->dp;
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_slave_to_port);
>>
>> You could probably make this a static inline in net/dsa.h, too. With or
>> without doing that:
>
> With dereferencing dsa_slave_priv, I don't think so.
Yes, I missed that dsa_slave_priv is not visible outside of dsa_priv.h
(on purpose). Thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists