[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200504195856.12340-1-olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 22:58:56 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 net] net: dsa: remove duplicate assignment in dsa_slave_add_cls_matchall_mirred
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
This was caused by a poor merge conflict resolution on my side. The
"act = &cls->rule->action.entries[0];" assignment was already present in
the code prior to the patch mentioned below.
Fixes: e13c2075280e ("net: dsa: refactor matchall mirred action to separate function")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
Changes in v2:
Forgot to copy the netdev list.
net/dsa/slave.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index ba8bf90dc0cc..a7f5fe64c2f3 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -856,20 +856,18 @@ dsa_slave_add_cls_matchall_mirred(struct net_device *dev,
struct dsa_port *to_dp;
int err;
- act = &cls->rule->action.entries[0];
-
if (!ds->ops->port_mirror_add)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (!act->dev)
- return -EINVAL;
-
if (!flow_action_basic_hw_stats_check(&cls->rule->action,
cls->common.extack))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
act = &cls->rule->action.entries[0];
+ if (!act->dev)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (!dsa_slave_dev_check(act->dev))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists