netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 10/11] s390/qeth: allow reset via ethtool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKOOJTzfbo9NJpOWpNn5B-oQ_yTvc7-ZxJP6dWvCV46p0z-T3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 13:09:27 -0700
From:   Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@...adcom.com>
To:     Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/11] s390/qeth: allow reset via ethtool

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:57 PM Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> It's a virtual device, _none_ of them make much sense?!

Why not introduce a new reset bit that captures the semantics of
whatever qeth_schedule_recovery does?

Regards,
Edwin Peer