[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 14:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: zenczykowski@...il.com
Cc: maze@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
willemb@...gle.com, lucien.xin@...il.com,
hannes@...essinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ipv6: add mtu lock check in
__ip6_rt_update_pmtu"
From: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 11:57:23 -0700
> The above reasoning is incorrect. IPv6 *requires* icmp based pmtu to work.
> There's already a comment to this effect elsewhere in the kernel:
How can an internet standard specify a system local policy decision
on this level?
If I want to lock the MTU value on my ipv6 routes, I have a reason
and I should be able to do it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists