lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 07:48:01 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [v3] nfp: abm: Fix incomplete release of system resources in
 nfp_abm_vnic_set_mac()

> Thanks for your feedback, and yes, I'd like to further adjust the description details
> to make the patch more clear and better.

Thanks for such a positive response.


> But because Jakub seems to prefer v1, so I'm somehow confused

Such a view can be reasonable.
The change acceptance varies between involved contributors.


> if I should submit a new version based on v1

Such a choice depends also on your willingness to clarify and improve
the software situation by better commit messages.


> or based on the version that has an addition of a jump target?

I propose that you can offer patch series with two update steps (for example)
according to the affected function implementation.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=47cf1b422e6093aee2a3e55d5e162112a2c69870#n102

1. Add a missing function call for the completion of the desired resource clean-up.

2. Adjust a bit of exception handling code so that it can be better reused
   at the end of this function.
   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=47cf1b422e6093aee2a3e55d5e162112a2c69870#n450


I am curious if you are going to answer (my) previous questions and suggestions
(in constructive ways).

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ