[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 07:48:01 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [v3] nfp: abm: Fix incomplete release of system resources in
nfp_abm_vnic_set_mac()
> Thanks for your feedback, and yes, I'd like to further adjust the description details
> to make the patch more clear and better.
Thanks for such a positive response.
> But because Jakub seems to prefer v1, so I'm somehow confused
Such a view can be reasonable.
The change acceptance varies between involved contributors.
> if I should submit a new version based on v1
Such a choice depends also on your willingness to clarify and improve
the software situation by better commit messages.
> or based on the version that has an addition of a jump target?
I propose that you can offer patch series with two update steps (for example)
according to the affected function implementation.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=47cf1b422e6093aee2a3e55d5e162112a2c69870#n102
1. Add a missing function call for the completion of the desired resource clean-up.
2. Adjust a bit of exception handling code so that it can be better reused
at the end of this function.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=47cf1b422e6093aee2a3e55d5e162112a2c69870#n450
I am curious if you are going to answer (my) previous questions and suggestions
(in constructive ways).
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists