lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed,  6 May 2020 08:31:33 +0000 (UTC)
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc:     yhchuang@...ltek.com, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org (open list:REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER
        (rtw88)), netdev@...r.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS),
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic
 context

Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:

> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context.
> 
> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue.
> 
> Fixes: 6343a6d4b213 ("rtw88: Add delay on polling h2c command status bit")
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

fd5d781964b0 rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11505147/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists