[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200506112217.161534-1-chentao107@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 19:22:17 +0800
From: ChenTao <chentao107@...wei.com>
To: <claudiu.manoil@....com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chentao107@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] net: enetc: Make some symbols static
Fix the following warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c:427:20: warning:
symbol 'enetc_act_fwd' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c:966:20: warning:
symbol 'enetc_check_flow_actions' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: ChenTao <chentao107@...wei.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
index 48e589e9d0f7..172acb602ccb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ struct enetc_psfp {
spinlock_t psfp_lock; /* spinlock for the struct enetc_psfp r/w */
};
-struct actions_fwd enetc_act_fwd[] = {
+static struct actions_fwd enetc_act_fwd[] = {
{
BIT(FLOW_ACTION_GATE),
BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS),
@@ -963,7 +963,8 @@ static int enetc_psfp_hw_set(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv,
return err;
}
-struct actions_fwd *enetc_check_flow_actions(u64 acts, unsigned int inputkeys)
+static struct actions_fwd *enetc_check_flow_actions(u64 acts,
+ unsigned int inputkeys)
{
int i;
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists