[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200506000320.28965-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 17:03:17 -0700
From: Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>, Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf, riscv: Enable missing verifier_zext optimizations on RV64
Commit 66d0d5a854a6 ("riscv: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen")
added support for the verifier zero-extension optimization on RV64 and
commit 46dd3d7d287b ("bpf, riscv: Enable zext optimization for more
RV64G ALU ops") enabled it for more instruction cases.
However, BPF_LSH BPF_X and BPF_{LSH,RSH,ARSH} BPF_K are still missing
the optimization.
This patch enables the zero-extension optimization for these remaining
cases.
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>
---
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index d208a9fd6c52..e2636902a74e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
emit(is64 ? rv_sll(rd, rd, rs) : rv_sllw(rd, rd, rs), ctx);
- if (!is64)
+ if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
@@ -692,19 +692,19 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
emit(is64 ? rv_slli(rd, rd, imm) : rv_slliw(rd, rd, imm), ctx);
- if (!is64)
+ if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
emit(is64 ? rv_srli(rd, rd, imm) : rv_srliw(rd, rd, imm), ctx);
- if (!is64)
+ if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
emit(is64 ? rv_srai(rd, rd, imm) : rv_sraiw(rd, rd, imm), ctx);
- if (!is64)
+ if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext)
emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
break;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists