netdev - Re: [PATCH -next] iwlwifi: pcie: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic operator for flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bfd6b3a7db0c50cd3d084510bd43c9e540688edd.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 06 May 2020 16:51:20 +0300
From:   Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Samuel Zou <zou_wei@...wei.com>,
        johannes.berg@...el.com, emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com,
        linuxwifi@...el.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] iwlwifi: pcie: Use bitwise instead of arithmetic
 operator for flags

On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 20:19 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 11:07 +0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
> > This silences the following coccinelle warning:
> > 
> > "WARNING: sum of probable bitmasks, consider |"
> 
> I suggest instead ignoring bad and irrelevant warnings.
> 
> PREFIX_LEN is 32 not 0x20 or BIT(5)
> PCI_DUMP_SIZE is 352
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c
> []
> > @@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ void iwl_trans_pcie_dump_regs(struct iwl_trans *trans)
> >  
> >  	/* Alloc a max size buffer */
> >  	alloc_size = PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC +  4 + PREFIX_LEN;
> > -	alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_DUMP_SIZE + PREFIX_LEN);
> > -	alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_MEM_DUMP_SIZE + PREFIX_LEN);
> > -	alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_PARENT_DUMP_SIZE + PREFIX_LEN);
> > +	alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_DUMP_SIZE | PREFIX_LEN);
> > +	alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_MEM_DUMP_SIZE | PREFIX_LEN);
> > +	alloc_size = max_t(u32, alloc_size, PCI_PARENT_DUMP_SIZE | PREFIX_LEN);
> >  
> >  	buf = kmalloc(alloc_size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> >  	if (!buf)

Yeah, those macros are clearly not bitmasks.  I'm dropping this patch.

--
Cheers,
Luca.