lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 May 2020 21:09:41 +0530
From:   Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@...il.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+1519f497f2f9f08183c6@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuba@...nel.org,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next boot error: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in
 ipmr_get_table

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 09:56:59AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Apr 28, 2020, at 4:57 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> >> net/ipv4/ipmr.c:136 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20200222063835.14328-2-frextrite@gmail.com/
> 
> Never been picked up for a few months due to some reasons. You could probably
> need to convince David, Paul, Steven or Linus to unblock the bot or carry patches
> on your own?
> 
> >> net/ipv6/ip6mr.c:124 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
> 
> Not sure about this if anyone is working on it. Adding a few people...
> 
> >> 
> >> other info that might help us debug this:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> >> 1 lock held by swapper/0/1:
> >> #0: ffffffff8a5a6330 (pernet_ops_rwsem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: register_pernet_subsys+0x16/0x40 net/core/net_namespace.c:1257
> >> 
> >> stack backtrace:
> >> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc3-next-20200428-syzkaller #0
> >> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> >> Call Trace:
> >> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
> >> dump_stack+0x18f/0x20d lib/dump_stack.c:118
> >> ip6mr_get_table+0x153/0x180 net/ipv6/ip6mr.c:124
> >> ip6mr_new_table+0x1b/0x70 net/ipv6/ip6mr.c:382
> >> ip6mr_rules_init net/ipv6/ip6mr.c:236 [inline]
> >> ip6mr_net_init+0x133/0x3f0 net/ipv6/ip6mr.c:1310
> >> ops_init+0xaf/0x420 net/core/net_namespace.c:151
> >> __register_pernet_operations net/core/net_namespace.c:1140 [inline]
> >> register_pernet_operations+0x346/0x840 net/core/net_namespace.c:1217
> >> register_pernet_subsys+0x25/0x40 net/core/net_namespace.c:1258
> >> ip6_mr_init+0x49/0x152 net/ipv6/ip6mr.c:1363
> >> inet6_init+0x1d7/0x6dc net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:1032
> >> do_one_initcall+0x10a/0x7d0 init/main.c:1159
> >> do_initcall_level init/main.c:1232 [inline]
> >> do_initcalls init/main.c:1248 [inline]
> >> do_basic_setup init/main.c:1268 [inline]
> >> kernel_init_freeable+0x501/0x5ae init/main.c:1454
> >> kernel_init+0xd/0x1bb init/main.c:1359
> >> ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:351
> >> 
> >> =============================
> >> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> >> 5.7.0-rc3-next-20200428-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> >> -----------------------------
> >> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:231 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> >> 
> >> other info that might help us debug this:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> >> 2 locks held by systemd/1:
> >> #0: ffff888098dfa450 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1659 [inline]
> >> #0: ffff888098dfa450 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3a/0xb0 fs/namespace.c:354
> >> #1: ffff8880988e8310 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:799 [inline]
> >> #1: ffff8880988e8310 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x92/0xf0 fs/xattr.c:219
> >> 
> >> stack backtrace:
> >> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.7.0-rc3-next-20200428-syzkaller #0
> >> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> >> Call Trace:
> >> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
> >> dump_stack+0x18f/0x20d lib/dump_stack.c:118
> >> evm_protected_xattr+0x1c2/0x210 security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:231
> >> evm_protect_xattr.isra.0+0xb6/0x3d0 security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:318
> >> evm_inode_setxattr+0xc4/0xf0 security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:387
> >> security_inode_setxattr+0x18f/0x200 security/security.c:1297
> >> vfs_setxattr+0xa7/0xf0 fs/xattr.c:220
> >> setxattr+0x23d/0x330 fs/xattr.c:451
> >> path_setxattr+0x170/0x190 fs/xattr.c:470
> >> __do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:485 [inline]
> >> __se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:481 [inline]
> >> __x64_sys_setxattr+0xc0/0x160 fs/xattr.c:481
> >> do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x7d0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:295
> >> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3
> >> RIP: 0033:0x7fe46005e67a
> >> Code: 48 8b 0d 21 18 2b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 ca b8 bc 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ee 17 2b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> >> RSP: 002b:00007fffef423568 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc
> >> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fe46005e67a
> >> RDX: 00007fffef4235e0 RSI: 0000556ea53ddf9b RDI: 0000556ea6766760
> >> RBP: 0000556ea53ddf9b R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000030
> >> R10: 0000000000000020 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fffef4235e0
> >> R13: 0000000000000020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000556ea6751700
> >> 
> >> security/device_cgroup.c:357 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200406105950.GA2285@workstation-kernel-dev/
> 
> The same story. The patch had been ignored for a while.
> 

Thank you for reminding! I will resend the patches and try to get them
merged ASAP.

> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists