[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bddef07-6cc0-e4d5-9394-f8691860015a@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 16:07:30 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
CC: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/20] tools/bpf: selftests: add iterator
programs for ipv6_route and netlink
On 5/5/20 11:04 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 11:30 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>>
>> Two bpf programs are added in this patch for netlink and ipv6_route
>> target. On my VM, I am able to achieve identical
>> results compared to /proc/net/netlink and /proc/net/ipv6_route.
>>
>> $ cat /proc/net/netlink
>> sk Eth Pid Groups Rmem Wmem Dump Locks Drops Inode
>> 000000002c42d58b 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 7
>> 00000000a4e8b5e1 0 1 00000551 0 0 0 2 0 18719
>> 00000000e1b1c195 4 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 16422
>> 000000007e6b29f9 6 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 16424
>> ....
>> 00000000159a170d 15 1862 00000002 0 0 0 2 0 1886
>> 000000009aca4bc9 15 3918224839 00000002 0 0 0 2 0 19076
>> 00000000d0ab31d2 15 1 00000002 0 0 0 2 0 18683
>> 000000008398fb08 16 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 27
>> $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/my_netlink
>> sk Eth Pid Groups Rmem Wmem Dump Locks Drops Inode
>> 000000002c42d58b 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 7
>> 00000000a4e8b5e1 0 1 00000551 0 0 0 2 0 18719
>> 00000000e1b1c195 4 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 16422
>> 000000007e6b29f9 6 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 16424
>> ....
>> 00000000159a170d 15 1862 00000002 0 0 0 2 0 1886
>> 000000009aca4bc9 15 3918224839 00000002 0 0 0 2 0 19076
>> 00000000d0ab31d2 15 1 00000002 0 0 0 2 0 18683
>> 000000008398fb08 16 0 00000000 0 0 0 2 0 27
>>
>> $ cat /proc/net/ipv6_route
>> fe800000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0
>> 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo
>> 00000000000000000000000000000001 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000003 00000000 80200001 lo
>> fe80000000000000c04b03fffe7827ce 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001 eth0
>> ff000000000000000000000000000000 08 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000003 00000000 00000001 eth0
>> 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo
>> $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/my_ipv6_route
>> fe800000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0
>> 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo
>> 00000000000000000000000000000001 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000003 00000000 80200001 lo
>> fe80000000000000c04b03fffe7827ce 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001 eth0
>> ff000000000000000000000000000000 08 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000003 00000000 00000001 eth0
>> 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
>> ---
>
> Just realized, this is only BPF programs, right? It would be good to
> have at least minimal user-space program that would verify and load
> it. Otherwise we'll be just testing compilation and it might "bit rot"
> a bit...
Totally agree. My latest selftest in test_progs actually tested loading,
anon iter creating and reading(). It did not verify contents though.
>
>> .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_ipv6_route.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++
>> .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_netlink.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_ipv6_route.c
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_netlink.c
>>
>
> [...]
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists