[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200506062423.28873-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 08:24:23 +0200
From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <sjpark@...zon.com>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<sj38.park@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <sjpark@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] Revert the 'socket_alloc' life cycle change
On Tue, 05 May 2020 12:00:49 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 11:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Series applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
>
> Nevermind, this doesn't even compile.
>
> net/smc/af_smc.c: In function ‘smc_switch_to_fallback’:
> net/smc/af_smc.c:473:19: error: ‘smc->clcsock->wq’ is a pointer; did you mean to use ‘->’?
> 473 | smc->clcsock->wq.fasync_list =
> | ^
> | ->
> net/smc/af_smc.c:474:25: error: ‘smc->sk.sk_socket->wq’ is a pointer; did you mean to use ‘->’?
> 474 | smc->sk.sk_socket->wq.fasync_list;
> | ^
> | ->
>
> So I had to revert these changes.
>
> When you make a change of this magnitude and scope you must do an
> allmodconfig build.
Definitely my fault. I will fix this in next spin.
Thanks,
SeongJae Park
>
> Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists