netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] selftests/bpf: generalize helpers to control background listener

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200506070025.kidlrs7ngtaue2nu@kafai-mbp>
Date:   Wed, 6 May 2020 00:00:25 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] selftests/bpf: generalize helpers to
 control background listener

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 01:27:26PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Move the following routines that let us start a background listener
> thread and connect to a server by fd to the test_prog:
> * start_server_thread - start background INADDR_ANY thread
> * stop_server_thread - stop the thread
> * connect_to_fd - connect to the server identified by fd
> 
> These will be used in the next commit.
The refactoring itself looks fine.

If I read it correctly, it is a simple connect() test.
I am not sure a thread is even needed.  accept() is also unnecessary.
Can all be done in one thread?