[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200506.170018.550097165407520983.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 17:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fgont@...networks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] ipv6: Implement draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@...networks.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 00:51:47 -0300
> Implement the upcoming rev of RFC4941 (IPv6 temporary addresses):
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-09
>
> * Reduces the default Valid Lifetime to 2 days
> The number of extra addresses employed when Valid Lifetime was
> 7 days exacerbated the stress caused on network
> elements/devices. Additionally, the motivation for temporary
> addresses is indeed privacy and reduced exposure. With a
> default Valid Lifetime of 7 days, an address that becomes
> revealed by active communication is reachable and exposed for
> one whole week. The only use case for a Valid Lifetime of 7
> days could be some application that is expecting to have long
> lived connections. But if you want to have a long lived
> connections, you shouldn't be using a temporary address in the
> first place. Additionally, in the era of mobile devices, general
> applications should nevertheless be prepared and robust to
> address changes (e.g. nodes swap wifi <-> 4G, etc.)
>
> * Employs different IIDs for different prefixes
> To avoid network activity correlation among addresses configured
> for different prefixes
>
> * Uses a simpler algorithm for IID generation
> No need to store "history" anywhere
>
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Gont <fgont@...networks.com>
Applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists