netdev - Re: [net PATCH v2] net: hsr: fix incorrect type usage for protocol variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <76101ccc-0a9d-dad9-1d34-f3d204a1dbe5@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 May 2020 08:14:15 -0400
From:   Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH v2] net: hsr: fix incorrect type usage for protocol
 variable

Hi David,

On 5/6/20 5:31 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> Fix following sparse checker warning:-
> 
> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:38:18: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:38:18:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] protocol
> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:38:18:    got restricted __be16 [usertype] h_proto
> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:39:25: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer
> net/hsr/hsr_slave.c:39:57: warning: restricted __be16 degrades to integer
> 
> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
> Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
> ---
>   v2 : Added Acked-by from Vinicius Costa Gomes
>   net/hsr/hsr_slave.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c b/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c
> index f4b9f7a3ce51..25b6ffba26cd 100644
> --- a/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c
> +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_slave.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t hsr_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
>   {
>   	struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb;
>   	struct hsr_port *port;
> -	u16 protocol;
> +	__be16 protocol;
>   
>   	if (!skb_mac_header_was_set(skb)) {
>   		WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: skb invalid", __func__);
> 
I saw that you have applied the initial patch to net-next. Please ignore 
this.

-- 
Murali Karicheri
Texas Instruments