| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5eb57f9a5819c_2a992ad50b5cc5b41@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 08:49:46 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, kernel-team@...com,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: add benchmark runner
infrastructure
Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> While working on BPF ringbuf implementation, testing, and benchmarking, I've
> developed a pretty generic and modular benchmark runner, which seems to be
> generically useful, as I've already used it for one more purpose (testing
> fastest way to trigger BPF program, to minimize overhead of in-kernel code).
>
> This patch adds generic part of benchmark runner and sets up Makefile for
> extending it with more sets of benchmarks.
Seems useful.
>
> Benchmarker itself operates by spinning up specified number of producer and
> consumer threads, setting up interval timer sending SIGALARM signal to
> application once a second. Every second, current snapshot with hits/drops
> counters are collected and stored in an array. Drops are useful for
> producer/consumer benchmarks in which producer might overwhelm consumers.
>
> Once test finishes after given amount of warm-up and testing seconds, mean and
> stddev are calculated (ignoring warm-up results) and is printed out to stdout.
> This setup seems to give consistent and accurate results.
>
> To validate behavior, I added two atomic counting tests: global and local.
> For global one, all the producer threads are atomically incrementing same
> counter as fast as possible. This, of course, leads to huge drop of
> performance once there is more than one producer thread due to CPUs fighting
> for the same memory location.
>
> Local counting, on the other hand, maintains one counter per each producer
> thread, incremented independently. Once per second, all counters are read and
> added together to form final "counting throughput" measurement. As expected,
> such setup demonstrates linear scalability with number of producers (as long
> as there are enough physical CPU cores, of course). See example output below.
> Also, this setup can nicely demonstrate disastrous effects of false sharing,
> if care is not taken to take those per-producer counters apart into
> independent cache lines.
>
> Demo output shows global counter first with 1 producer, then with 4. Both
> total and per-producer performance significantly drop. The last run is local
> counter with 4 producers, demonstrating near-perfect scalability.
>
> $ ./bench -a -w1 -d2 -p1 count-global
> Setting up benchmark 'count-global'...
> Benchmark 'count-global' started.
> Iter 0 ( 24.822us): hits 148.179M/s (148.179M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Iter 1 ( 37.939us): hits 149.308M/s (149.308M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Iter 2 (-10.774us): hits 150.717M/s (150.717M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Iter 3 ( 3.807us): hits 151.435M/s (151.435M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Summary: hits 150.488 ± 1.079M/s (150.488M/prod), drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s
>
> $ ./bench -a -w1 -d2 -p4 count-global
> Setting up benchmark 'count-global'...
> Benchmark 'count-global' started.
> Iter 0 ( 60.659us): hits 53.910M/s ( 13.477M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Iter 1 (-17.658us): hits 53.722M/s ( 13.431M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Iter 2 ( 5.865us): hits 53.495M/s ( 13.374M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Iter 3 ( 0.104us): hits 53.606M/s ( 13.402M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Summary: hits 53.608 ± 0.113M/s ( 13.402M/prod), drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s
>
> $ ./bench -a -w1 -d2 -p4 count-local
> Setting up benchmark 'count-local'...
> Benchmark 'count-local' started.
> Iter 0 ( 23.388us): hits 640.450M/s (160.113M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Iter 1 ( 2.291us): hits 605.661M/s (151.415M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Iter 2 ( -6.415us): hits 607.092M/s (151.773M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Iter 3 ( -1.361us): hits 601.796M/s (150.449M/prod), drops 0.000M/s
> Summary: hits 604.849 ± 2.739M/s (151.212M/prod), drops 0.000 ± 0.000M/s
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> ---
Couple nits but otherwise lgtm. I think it should probably be moved
into its own directory though ./bpf/bench/
The other question would be how much stuff do we want to live in
selftests vs outside selftests/bpf but I think its fine and makes
it easy to build small benchmark programs in ./bpf/progs/
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 11 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c | 364 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h | 74 +++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench_count.c | 91 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 540 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench_count.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
> index 3ff031972975..1bb204cee853 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
> @@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ test_cpp
> /bpf_gcc
> /tools
> /runqslower
> +/bench
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 3d942be23d09..ab03362d46e4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := with_addr.sh \
> # Compile but not part of 'make run_tests'
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = test_sock_addr test_skb_cgroup_id_user \
> flow_dissector_load test_flow_dissector test_tcp_check_syncookie_user \
> - test_lirc_mode2_user xdping test_cpp runqslower
> + test_lirc_mode2_user xdping test_cpp runqslower bench
>
> TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS = urandom_read
>
> @@ -405,6 +405,15 @@ $(OUTPUT)/test_cpp: test_cpp.cpp $(OUTPUT)/test_core_extern.skel.h $(BPFOBJ)
> $(call msg,CXX,,$@)
> $(CXX) $(CFLAGS) $^ $(LDLIBS) -o $@
>
> +# Benchmark runner
> +$(OUTPUT)/bench.o: bench.h
> +$(OUTPUT)/bench_count.o: bench.h
> +$(OUTPUT)/bench: LDLIBS += -lm
> +$(OUTPUT)/bench: $(OUTPUT)/bench.o \
> + $(OUTPUT)/bench_count.o
> + $(call msg,BINARY,,$@)
> + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(filter %.a %.o,$^) $(LDLIBS)
> +
> EXTRA_CLEAN := $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS) $(SCRATCH_DIR) \
> prog_tests/tests.h map_tests/tests.h verifier/tests.h \
> feature \
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a20482bb74e2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <argp.h>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> +#include <sys/time.h>
> +#include <sched.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +#include <sys/sysinfo.h>
> +#include <sys/resource.h>
> +#include <signal.h>
> +#include "bench.h"
> +
> +struct env env = {
> + .duration_sec = 10,
> + .warmup_sec = 5,
Just curious I'm guessing the duration/warmap are arbitrary here? Seems
a bit long I would bet 5,1 would be enough for global/local test at
least.
> + .affinity = false,
> + .consumer_cnt = 1,
> + .producer_cnt = 1,
> +};
> +
[...]
> +void hits_drops_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns)
> +{
> + double hits_per_sec, drops_per_sec;
> + double hits_per_prod;
> +
> + hits_per_sec = res->hits / 1000000.0 / (delta_ns / 1000000000.0);
> + hits_per_prod = hits_per_sec / env.producer_cnt;
Per producer counts would also be useful. Averaging over producer cnt could
hide issues with fairness.
> + drops_per_sec = res->drops / 1000000.0 / (delta_ns / 1000000000.0);
> +
> + printf("Iter %3d (%7.3lfus): ",
> + iter, (delta_ns - 1000000000) / 1000.0);
> +
> + printf("hits %8.3lfM/s (%7.3lfM/prod), drops %8.3lfM/s\n",
> + hits_per_sec, hits_per_prod, drops_per_sec);
> +}
> +
[...]
> +const char *argp_program_version = "benchmark";
> +const char *argp_program_bug_address = "<bpf@...r.kernel.org>";
> +const char argp_program_doc[] =
> +"benchmark Generic benchmarking framework.\n"
> +"\n"
> +"This tool runs benchmarks.\n"
> +"\n"
> +"USAGE: benchmark <mode>\n"
> +"\n"
> +"EXAMPLES:\n"
> +" benchmark count-local # run 'count-local' benchmark with 1 producer and 1 consumer\n"
> +" benchmark -p16 -c8 -a count-local # run 'count-local' benchmark with 16 producer and 8 consumer threads, pinned to CPUs\n";
> +
> +static const struct argp_option opts[] = {
> + { "mode", 'm', "MODE", 0, "Benchmark mode"},
"Benchmark mode" hmm not sure what this is for yet. Only on
first patch though so maybe I'll become enlightened?
> + { "list", 'l', NULL, 0, "List available benchmarks"},
> + { "duration", 'd', "SEC", 0, "Duration of benchmark, seconds"},
> + { "warmup", 'w', "SEC", 0, "Warm-up period, seconds"},
> + { "producers", 'p', "NUM", 0, "Number of producer threads"},
> + { "consumers", 'c', "NUM", 0, "Number of consumer threads"},
> + { "verbose", 'v', NULL, 0, "Verbose debug output"},
> + { "affinity", 'a', NULL, 0, "Set consumer/producer thread affinity"},
> + { "b2b", 'b', NULL, 0, "Back-to-back mode"},
> + { "rb-output", 10001, NULL, 0, "Set consumer/producer thread affinity"},
> + {},
> +};
[...]
> +
> +static void set_thread_affinity(pthread_t thread, int cpu)
> +{
> + cpu_set_t cpuset;
> +
> + CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
> + CPU_SET(cpu, &cpuset);
> + if (pthread_setaffinity_np(thread, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset))
> + printf("setting affinity to CPU #%d failed: %d\n", cpu, errno);
> +}
Should we error out on affinity errors?
> +
> +static struct bench_state {
> + int res_cnt;
> + struct bench_res *results;
> + pthread_t *consumers;
> + pthread_t *producers;
> +} state;
[...]
> +
> +static void setup_benchmark()
> +{
> + int i, err;
> +
> + if (!env.mode) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "benchmark mode is not specified\n");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(benchs); i++) {
> + if (strcmp(benchs[i]->name, env.mode) == 0) {
Ah the mode. OK maybe in description call it, "Benchmark mode to run" or
"Benchmark test"? Or leave it its probably fine.
> + bench = benchs[i];
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + if (!bench) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "benchmark '%s' not found\n", env.mode);
> + exit(1);
> + }
> +
> + printf("Setting up benchmark '%s'...\n", bench->name);
> +
> + state.producers = calloc(env.producer_cnt, sizeof(*state.producers));
> + state.consumers = calloc(env.consumer_cnt, sizeof(*state.consumers));
> + state.results = calloc(env.duration_sec + env.warmup_sec + 2,
> + sizeof(*state.results));
> + if (!state.producers || !state.consumers || !state.results)
> + exit(1);
> +
> + if (bench->validate)
> + bench->validate();
> + if (bench->setup)
> + bench->setup();
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < env.consumer_cnt; i++) {
> + err = pthread_create(&state.consumers[i], NULL,
> + bench->consumer_thread, (void *)(long)i);
> + if (err) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "failed to create consumer thread #%d: %d\n",
> + i, -errno);
> + exit(1);
> + }
> + if (env.affinity)
> + set_thread_affinity(state.consumers[i], i);
> + }
> + for (i = 0; i < env.producer_cnt; i++) {
> + err = pthread_create(&state.producers[i], NULL,
> + bench->producer_thread, (void *)(long)i);
> + if (err) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "failed to create producer thread #%d: %d\n",
> + i, -errno);
> + exit(1);
> + }
> + if (env.affinity)
> + set_thread_affinity(state.producers[i],
> + env.consumer_cnt + i);
> + }
> +
> + printf("Benchmark '%s' started.\n", bench->name);
> +}
[...]
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench_count.c
How about a ./bpf/bench/ directory? Seems we are going to get a few
bench_* tests here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists