netdev - Re: [PATCH net] dt-bindings: net: Convert UniPhier AVE4 controller to json-schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <846aef8c-50b4-e264-9a9e-7d7f25729a94@socionext.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 17:44:53 +0900
From:   Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dt-bindings: net: Convert UniPhier AVE4 controller to
 json-schema

Hi David, Rob,

On 2020/05/02 7:21, David Miller wrote:
> From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:31:22 +0900
> 
>> Convert the UniPhier AVE4 controller binding to DT schema format.
>> This changes phy-handle property to required.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
> 
> DT folks, is it ok if I take this into net-next or do you folks want to
> take it instead?
Rob, how about this?
I think net-next is preferable.

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi