netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/21] bpf: support bpf tracing/iter programs for BPF_LINK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200509175902.2475262-1-yhs@fb.com>
Date:   Sat, 9 May 2020 10:59:02 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/21] bpf: support bpf tracing/iter programs for BPF_LINK_UPDATE

Added BPF_LINK_UPDATE support for tracing/iter programs.
This way, a file based bpf iterator, which holds a reference
to the link, can have its bpf program updated without
creating new files.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
index 03f5832909db..0542a243b78c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ struct bpf_iter_link {
 static struct list_head targets = LIST_HEAD_INIT(targets);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(targets_mutex);
 
+/* protect bpf_iter_link changes */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(link_mutex);
+
 int bpf_iter_reg_target(struct bpf_iter_reg *reg_info)
 {
 	struct bpf_iter_target_info *tinfo;
@@ -111,9 +114,37 @@ static void bpf_iter_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
 	kfree(iter_link);
 }
 
+static int bpf_iter_link_replace(struct bpf_link *link,
+				 struct bpf_prog *new_prog,
+				 struct bpf_prog *old_prog)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&link_mutex);
+	if (old_prog && link->prog != old_prog) {
+		ret = -EPERM;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+	if (link->prog->type != new_prog->type ||
+	    link->prog->expected_attach_type != new_prog->expected_attach_type ||
+	    link->prog->aux->attach_btf_id != new_prog->aux->attach_btf_id) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+	old_prog = xchg(&link->prog, new_prog);
+	bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
+
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&link_mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_iter_link_lops = {
 	.release = bpf_iter_link_release,
 	.dealloc = bpf_iter_link_dealloc,
+	.update_prog = bpf_iter_link_replace,
 };
 
 int bpf_iter_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
-- 
2.24.1