netdev - [PATCH net-next 6/9] mlxsw: spectrum_flower: Forbid to insert flower rules in collision with matchall rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat,  9 May 2020 23:06:07 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/9] mlxsw: spectrum_flower: Forbid to insert flower rules in collision with matchall rules

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

On ingress, the matchall rules doing mirroring and sampling are offloaded
into hardware blocks that are processed before any flower rules.
On egress, the matchall mirroring rules are offloaded into hardware
block that is processed after all flower rules.

Therefore check the priorities of inserted flower rules against
existing matchall rules and ensure the correct ordering.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
---
 .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c
index 18d22217e435..b286fe158820 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c
@@ -505,6 +505,34 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_flower_parse(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 					     f->common.extack);
 }
 
+static int mlxsw_sp_flower_mall_prio_check(struct mlxsw_sp_flow_block *block,
+					   struct flow_cls_offload *f)
+{
+	bool ingress = mlxsw_sp_flow_block_is_ingress_bound(block);
+	unsigned int mall_min_prio;
+	unsigned int mall_max_prio;
+	int err;
+
+	err = mlxsw_sp_mall_prio_get(block, f->common.chain_index,
+				     &mall_min_prio, &mall_max_prio);
+	if (err) {
+		if (err == -ENOENT)
+			/* No matchall filters installed on this chain. */
+			return 0;
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(f->common.extack, "Failed to get matchall priorities");
+		return err;
+	}
+	if (ingress && f->common.prio <= mall_min_prio) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(f->common.extack, "Failed to add in front of existing matchall rules");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	if (!ingress && f->common.prio >= mall_max_prio) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(f->common.extack, "Failed to add behind of existing matchall rules");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int mlxsw_sp_flower_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 			    struct mlxsw_sp_flow_block *block,
 			    struct flow_cls_offload *f)
@@ -514,6 +542,10 @@ int mlxsw_sp_flower_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 	struct mlxsw_sp_acl_rule *rule;
 	int err;
 
+	err = mlxsw_sp_flower_mall_prio_check(block, f);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	ruleset = mlxsw_sp_acl_ruleset_get(mlxsw_sp, block,
 					   f->common.chain_index,
 					   MLXSW_SP_ACL_PROFILE_FLOWER, NULL);
-- 
2.26.2