netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/sonic: Fix some resource leaks in error handling paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 19:04:02 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sonic: Fix some resource leaks in error handling
 paths

On Sat, 9 May 2020 11:57:44 +1000 (AEST) Finn Thain wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2020, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri,  8 May 2020 19:25:57 +0200 Christophe JAILLET wrote:  
> > > Only macsonic has been compile tested. I don't have the needed setup to
> > > compile xtsonic  
> > 
> > Well, we gotta do that before we apply the patch :S
> >   
> 
> I've compiled xtsonic.c with this patch.
> 
> > Does the driver actually depend on some platform stuff,  
> 
> xtsonic.c looks portable enough but it has some asm includes that I 
> haven't looked at. It is really a question for the arch maintainers.

I see.

> >  or can we do this:
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/Kconfig
> > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ config NS83820
> >  
> >  config XTENSA_XT2000_SONIC
> >         tristate "Xtensa XT2000 onboard SONIC Ethernet support"
> > -       depends on XTENSA_PLATFORM_XT2000
> > +       depends on XTENSA_PLATFORM_XT2000 || COMPILE_TEST
> >         ---help---
> >           This is the driver for the onboard card of the Xtensa XT2000 board.
> >  
> > ?
> >   
> 
> That's effectively what I did to compile test xtsonic.c (I removed the 
> line to get the same effect).

Thank you, that should do!