lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200508222019.0f6319b6@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 22:20:19 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/dst: use a smaller percpu_counter batch
 for dst entries accounting

On Thu,  7 May 2020 18:58:10 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> percpu_counter_add() uses a default batch size which is quite big
> on platforms with 256 cpus. (2*256 -> 512)
> 
> This means dst_entries_get_fast() can be off by +/- 2*(nr_cpus^2)
> (131072 on servers with 256 cpus)
> 
> Reduce the batch size to something more reasonable, and
> add logic to ip6_dst_gc() to call dst_entries_get_slow()
> before calling the _very_ expensive fib6_run_gc() function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Applied, thank you!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ