lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 21:04:32 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] checkpatch: warn about uses of ENOTSUPP On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:51:48AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > ENOTSUPP often feels like the right error code to use, but it's > in fact not a standard Unix error. E.g.: Hi Jakub You said ENOTSUPP is for NFS? Would it make sense to special case fs/nfs* files and not warn there? I assume that would reduce the number of false positives? Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists