[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200510002731.ztx2inlfs65x2izc@ast-mbp>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 17:27:31 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/21] bpf: implement bpf iterator for kernel
data
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 10:58:59AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
> Changelog:
> v3 -> v4:
> - in bpf_seq_read(), if start() failed with an error, return that
> error to user space (Andrii)
> - in bpf_seq_printf(), if reading kernel memory failed for
> %s and %p{i,I}{4,6}, set buffer to empty string or address 0.
> Documented this behavior in uapi header (Andrii)
> - fix a few error handling issues for bpftool (Andrii)
> - A few other minor fixes and cosmetic changes.
Looks great overall. Applied.
But few follow ups are necessary.
The main gotcha is that new tests need llvm with the fix
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78466.
I think it was applied to llvm 10 branch already,
but please add selftests/bpf/README.rst and mention
that above llvm commit is necessary to successfully pass the tests.
Also mention the verifier error that folks will see when llvm is buggy.
Few other nits I noticed in relevant patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists