lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 9 May 2020 17:35:35 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <>
To:     Yonghong Song <>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <>,,
        Martin KaFai Lau <>,,
        Alexei Starovoitov <>,
        Daniel Borkmann <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/21] tools/libbpf: add bpf_iter support

On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 10:59:17AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> @@ -6891,6 +6897,7 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_st_ops_relos(struct bpf_object *obj,
>  #define BTF_TRACE_PREFIX "btf_trace_"
>  #define BTF_LSM_PREFIX "bpf_lsm_"
> +#define BTF_ITER_PREFIX "__bpf_iter__"
>  #define BTF_MAX_NAME_SIZE 128

In the kernel source the prefix doesn't stand out, but on libbpf side it looks
inconsistent. May be drop __ prefix and keep one _ in the suffix?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists