lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 17:35:35 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, kernel-team@...com Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/21] tools/libbpf: add bpf_iter support On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 10:59:17AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote: > @@ -6891,6 +6897,7 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_st_ops_relos(struct bpf_object *obj, > > #define BTF_TRACE_PREFIX "btf_trace_" > #define BTF_LSM_PREFIX "bpf_lsm_" > +#define BTF_ITER_PREFIX "__bpf_iter__" > #define BTF_MAX_NAME_SIZE 128 In the kernel source the prefix doesn't stand out, but on libbpf side it looks inconsistent. May be drop __ prefix and keep one _ in the suffix?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists