lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 19:32:05 +0000
From:   Christian Herber <>
To:     Andrew Lunn <>,
        Oleksij Rempel <>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <>,
        Florian Fainelli <>,
        Heiner Kallweit <>,
        Jakub Kicinski <>,
        Jonathan Corbet <>,
        Michal Kubecek <>,
        David Jander <>,
        "" <>,
        "" <>,
        "" <>,
        Russell King <>,
        "" <>,
        Marek Vasut <>
Subject: RE: Re: signal quality and cable diagnostic

On May 11, 2020 4:33:53 PM Andrew Lunn <> wrote:
> Are the classes part of the Open Alliance specification? Ideally we
> want to report something standardized, not something proprietary to
> NXP.
>        Andrew

Hi Andrew,

Such mechanisms are standardized and supported by pretty much all devices in the market. The Open Alliance specification is publicly available here:

As the specification is newer than the 100BASE-T1 spec, do not expect first generation devices to follow the register definitions as per Open Alliance. But for future devices, also registers should be same across different vendors.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists