[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hpsBvjDJpRKwOj8ncN_NyE1Qh+HQfYLFu3eb_wgyS__bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 14:40:29 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/15] net: dsa: provide an option for drivers to
always receive bridge VLANs
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 14:38, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 07:42:41PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> >
> > DSA assumes that a bridge which has vlan filtering disabled is not
> > vlan aware, and ignores all vlan configuration. However, the kernel
> > software bridge code allows configuration in this state.
> >
> > This causes the kernel's idea of the bridge vlan state and the
> > hardware state to disagree, so "bridge vlan show" indicates a correct
> > configuration but the hardware lacks all configuration. Even worse,
> > enabling vlan filtering on a DSA bridge immediately blocks all traffic
> > which, given the output of "bridge vlan show", is very confusing.
> >
> > Provide an option that drivers can set to indicate they want to receive
> > vlan configuration even when vlan filtering is disabled. At the very
> > least, this is safe for Marvell DSA bridges, which do not look up
> > ingress traffic in the VTU if the port is in 8021Q disabled state. It is
> > also safe for the Ocelot switch family. Whether this change is suitable
> > for all DSA bridges is not known.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> This patch was NAK'd because of objections to the "vlan_bridge_vtu"
> name. Unfortunately, this means that the bug for Marvell switches
> remains unfixed to this day.
>
How about "accept_vlan_while_unaware"?
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up
Thanks,
-Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists