lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200512150414.267198-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 17:04:04 +0200
From:   Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jérôme Pouiller 
        <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/17] staging: wfx: fix endianness of hif_req_read_mib fields

From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>

The structs hif_{req,cnf}_read_mib contain only little endian values.
Thus, it is necessary to fix byte ordering before to use them.
Especially, sparse detected wrong accesses to fields mib_id and length.

Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
index 58013c019192..490a9de54faf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
@@ -189,17 +189,17 @@ int hif_read_mib(struct wfx_dev *wdev, int vif_id, u16 mib_id,
 	wfx_fill_header(hif, vif_id, HIF_REQ_ID_READ_MIB, sizeof(*body));
 	ret = wfx_cmd_send(wdev, hif, reply, buf_len, false);
 
-	if (!ret && mib_id != reply->mib_id) {
+	if (!ret && mib_id != le16_to_cpu(reply->mib_id)) {
 		dev_warn(wdev->dev,
 			 "%s: confirmation mismatch request\n", __func__);
 		ret = -EIO;
 	}
 	if (ret == -ENOMEM)
-		dev_err(wdev->dev,
-			"buffer is too small to receive %s (%zu < %d)\n",
-			get_mib_name(mib_id), val_len, reply->length);
+		dev_err(wdev->dev, "buffer is too small to receive %s (%zu < %d)\n",
+			get_mib_name(mib_id), val_len,
+			le16_to_cpu(reply->length));
 	if (!ret)
-		memcpy(val, &reply->mib_data, reply->length);
+		memcpy(val, &reply->mib_data, le16_to_cpu(reply->length));
 	else
 		memset(val, 0xFF, val_len);
 	kfree(hif);
-- 
2.26.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ