lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <980597f7-5170-72f2-ec2f-efc64f5e27eb@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:06 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stable/linux-4.4.y bisection: baseline.login on
 at91-sama5d4_xplained



On 5/12/2020 4:10 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 12/05/2020 06:54:29+0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
>> Please see the bisection report below about a boot failure.
>>
>> Reports aren't automatically sent to the public while we're
>> trialing new bisection features on kernelci.org but this one
>> looks valid.
>>
>> It appears to be due to the fact that the network interface is
>> failing to get brought up:
>>
>> [  114.385000] Waiting up to 10 more seconds for network.
>> [  124.355000] Sending DHCP requests ...#
>> ..#
>> .#
>>  timed out!
>> [  212.355000] IP-Config: Reopening network devices...
>> [  212.365000] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
>> #
>>
>>
>> I guess the board would boot fine without network if it didn't
>> have ip=dhcp in the command line, so it's not strictly a kernel
>> boot failure but still an ethernet issue.
>>
> 
> I think the resolution of this issue is
> 99f81afc139c6edd14d77a91ee91685a414a1c66. If this is taken, then I think
> f5aba91d7f186cba84af966a741a0346de603cd4 should also be backported.

Agreed.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ