[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbX77FFcSRR70GVKEViM3eD6zznFP5_tg_cVp5oN=JwAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:21:41 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: add comments to interpret bpf_prog
return values
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 8:53 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>
> Add a short comment in bpf_iter_run_prog() function to
> explain how bpf_prog return value is converted to
> seq_ops->show() return value:
> bpf_prog return seq_ops()->show() return
> 0 0
> 1 -EAGAIN
>
> When show() return value is -EAGAIN, the current
> bpf_seq_read() will end. If the current seq_file buffer
> is empty, -EAGAIN will return to user space. Otherwise,
> the buffer will be copied to user space.
> In both cases, the next bpf_seq_read() call will
> try to show the same object which returned -EAGAIN
> previously.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> ---
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists