lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 08:17:54 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'David Miller' <>
CC:     "" <>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] net/ipv4/raw Optimise ipv4 raw sends when

From: David Miller <>
> Sent: 12 May 2020 00:10
> From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 21:28:18 +0000
> > In this case the "modified in userspace meanwhile" just breaks the
> > application - it isn't any kind of security issue.
> The kernel must provide correct behavior based upon the stable IP
> header that it copies into userspace.  I'm not moving on this
> requirement, sorry.
> I'm sure you have great reasons why you can't use normal UDP sockets
> for RTP traffic, but that's how you will get a cached route and avoid
> this exact problem.

Not unless you can tell me how to create a UDP socket that doesn't
receive data.
Even if there is a corresponding RTP receive flow there is no reason
why it should use the same port numbers and IP addresses.


Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists