netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next] net/ipv4/raw Optimise ipv4 raw sends when IP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 08:17:54 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'David Miller' <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] net/ipv4/raw Optimise ipv4 raw sends when
 IP_HDRINCL set.

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Sent: 12 May 2020 00:10
> From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 21:28:18 +0000
> 
> > In this case the "modified in userspace meanwhile" just breaks the
> > application - it isn't any kind of security issue.
> 
> The kernel must provide correct behavior based upon the stable IP
> header that it copies into userspace.  I'm not moving on this
> requirement, sorry.
> 
> I'm sure you have great reasons why you can't use normal UDP sockets
> for RTP traffic, but that's how you will get a cached route and avoid
> this exact problem.

Not unless you can tell me how to create a UDP socket that doesn't
receive data.
Even if there is a corresponding RTP receive flow there is no reason
why it should use the same port numbers and IP addresses.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)