[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <022f15a5-92b2-1531-a1cc-8fe007bfcdda@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 13:56:40 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] devlink: refactor end checks in
devlink_nl_cmd_region_read_dumpit
On 5/13/2020 10:28 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Clean up after recent fixes, move address calculations
> around and change the variable init, so that we can have
> just one start_offset == end_offset check.
>
> Make the check a little stricter to preserve the -EINVAL
> error if requested start offset is larger than the region
> itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> net/core/devlink.c | 41 ++++++++-----------
> .../drivers/net/netdevsim/devlink.sh | 15 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> index 20f935fa29f5..7b76e5fffc10 100644
> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> @@ -4215,7 +4215,6 @@ static int devlink_nl_region_read_snapshot_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct nlattr **attrs,
> u64 start_offset,
> u64 end_offset,
> - bool dump,
> u64 *new_offset)
> {
> struct devlink_snapshot *snapshot;
> @@ -4230,9 +4229,6 @@ static int devlink_nl_region_read_snapshot_fill(struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (!snapshot)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (end_offset > region->size || dump)
> - end_offset = region->size;
> -
Yea I saw this back when I was looking at enabling region dump without a
snapshot. At this point, it doesn't seem necessary, because the snapshot
time is relatively low, and the changes to make snapshot id a bit easier
to use in scripts (i.e. dynamic generation and saving) mean that it
isn't that useful.
Good to see this cleaned up!
> while (curr_offset < end_offset) {
> u32 data_size;
> u8 *data;
> @@ -4260,13 +4256,12 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_region_read_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct netlink_callback *cb)
> {
> const struct genl_dumpit_info *info = genl_dumpit_info(cb);
> - u64 ret_offset, start_offset, end_offset = 0;
> + u64 ret_offset, start_offset, end_offset = U64_MAX;
> struct nlattr **attrs = info->attrs;
> struct devlink_region *region;
> struct nlattr *chunks_attr;
> const char *region_name;
> struct devlink *devlink;
> - bool dump = true;
> void *hdr;
> int err;
>
> @@ -4294,8 +4289,21 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_region_read_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> + if (attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_ADDR] &&
> + attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_LEN]) {
> + if (!start_offset)
> + start_offset =
> + nla_get_u64(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_ADDR]);
> +
> + end_offset = nla_get_u64(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_ADDR]);
At first, reading this confused me a bit, but it makes sense. The end
is always "beginning + length".
If the start_offset is set before, this simply means that we needed to
read over multiple buffers. Ok.
> + end_offset += nla_get_u64(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_LEN]);
> + }
> +
> + if (end_offset > region->size)
> + end_offset = region->size;
> +
> /* return 0 if there is no further data to read */
> - if (start_offset >= region->size) {
> + if (start_offset == end_offset) {
Why change this to ==? isn't it possible to specify a start_offset that
is out of bounds? I think this should still be >=
> err = 0;
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> @@ -4322,27 +4330,10 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_region_read_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> goto nla_put_failure;
> }
>
> - if (attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_ADDR] &&
> - attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_LEN]) {
> - if (!start_offset)
> - start_offset =
> - nla_get_u64(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_ADDR]);
> -
> - end_offset = nla_get_u64(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_ADDR]);
> - end_offset += nla_get_u64(attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_REGION_CHUNK_LEN]);
> - dump = false;
> -
> - if (start_offset == end_offset) {
> - err = 0;
> - goto nla_put_failure;
> - }
> - }
> -
> err = devlink_nl_region_read_snapshot_fill(skb, devlink,
> region, attrs,
> start_offset,
> - end_offset, dump,
> - &ret_offset);
> + end_offset, &ret_offset);
>
> if (err && err != -EMSGSIZE)
> goto nla_put_failure;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netdevsim/devlink.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netdevsim/devlink.sh
> index ad539eccddcb..de4b32fc4223 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netdevsim/devlink.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netdevsim/devlink.sh
> @@ -146,6 +146,21 @@ regions_test()
>
> check_region_snapshot_count dummy post-first-request 3
>
> + devlink region dump $DL_HANDLE/dummy snapshot 25 >> /dev/null
> + check_err $? "Failed to dump snapshot with id 25"
> +
> + devlink region read $DL_HANDLE/dummy snapshot 25 addr 0 len 1 >> /dev/null
> + check_err $? "Failed to read snapshot with id 25 (1 byte)"
> +
> + devlink region read $DL_HANDLE/dummy snapshot 25 addr 128 len 128 >> /dev/null
> + check_err $? "Failed to read snapshot with id 25 (128 bytes)"
> +
> + devlink region read $DL_HANDLE/dummy snapshot 25 addr 128 len $((1<<32)) >> /dev/null
> + check_err $? "Failed to read snapshot with id 25 (oversized)"
> +
> + devlink region read $DL_HANDLE/dummy snapshot 25 addr $((1<<32)) len 128 >> /dev/null 2>&1
> + check_fail $? "Bad read of snapshot with id 25 did not fail"
> +
> devlink region del $DL_HANDLE/dummy snapshot 25
> check_err $? "Failed to delete snapshot with id 25"
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists