netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: ethernet: validate pause autoneg setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <08316b1f-a88f-1eb5-5ab2-06c23900cae7@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 15:09:59 -0700
From:   Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: ethernet: validate pause autoneg
 setting

On 5/13/2020 6:49 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> So, I think consistency of implementation is more important than fixing
>> this; the current behaviour has been established for many years now.
> 
> Hi Russell, Doug
> 
> With netlink ethtool we have the possibility of adding a new API to
> control this. And we can leave the IOCTL API alone, and the current
> ethtool commands. We can add a new command to ethtool which uses the new API.
> 
> Question is, do we want to do this? Would we be introducing yet more
> confusion, rather than making the situation better?
> 
> 	Andrew
> 
I think it is likely to introduce more confusion.
-Doug