[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514175851.GA886@salvia>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 19:58:51 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Linux Network Development Mailing List
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libiptc.c: pragma disable a gcc compiler warning
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 02:34:04PM -0700, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
>
> Fixes:
> In file included from libip4tc.c:113:
> In function ‘iptcc_compile_chain’,
> inlined from ‘iptcc_compile_table’ at libiptc.c:1246:13,
> inlined from ‘iptc_commit’ at libiptc.c:2575:8,
> inlined from ‘iptc_commit’ at libiptc.c:2513:1:
> libiptc.c:1172:2: warning: writing 16 bytes into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
> 1172 | memcpy(&foot->e.counters, &c->counters, sizeof(STRUCT_COUNTERS));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ../include/libiptc/libiptc.h:12,
> from libip4tc.c:29:
> libiptc.c: In function ‘iptc_commit’:
> ../include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:202:19: note: at offset 0 to object ‘entries’ with size 0 declared here
> 202 | struct ipt_entry entries[0];
> | ^~~~~~~
>
> Which was found via compilation on Fedora 32.
>
> Test: builds without warnings
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
> ---
> libiptc/libiptc.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libiptc/libiptc.c b/libiptc/libiptc.c
> index 58882015..1a92b267 100644
> --- a/libiptc/libiptc.c
> +++ b/libiptc/libiptc.c
> @@ -1169,7 +1169,10 @@ static int iptcc_compile_chain(struct xtc_handle *h, STRUCT_REPLACE *repl, struc
> else
> foot->target.verdict = RETURN;
> /* set policy-counters */
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overflow"
> memcpy(&foot->e.counters, &c->counters, sizeof(STRUCT_COUNTERS));
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
Probably make a casting from foot->e.counters to the counters object
to make gcc happy?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists