netdev - skbedit priority action vs tc-flower hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+h21hqjwn=+FwQyu8ZzscJcfmmucaKx9oaHsjF6BNaDg+ea7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 14:18:28 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: skbedit priority action vs tc-flower hw_tc

Hi,

I noticed that there seem to be 2 ways of doing the same thing, which
is performing QoS classification. The skbedit priority offload action
goes through FLOW_ACTION_PRIORITY, and hw_tc goes through
tc_classid_to_hwtc.
It appears that drivers are using one or the other method mostly at random.
Also, there appears to be no way of doing the other thing: matching on
a certain traffic class with flower (e.g. installing a traffic class
policer). How would that be done?

Thanks,
-Vladimir