[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200515131459.GQ527401@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:14:59 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@...adcom.com>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Stephane Le Provost <stephane.leprovost@...iatek.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pedro Tsai <pedro.tsai@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andrew Perepech <andrew.perepech@...iatek.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/15] net: ethernet: mtk-eth-mac: new driver
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:11:14AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> czw., 14 maj 2020 o 18:19 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> napisaĆ(a):
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:00 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > >
> > > This adds the driver for the MediaTek Ethernet MAC used on the MT8* SoC
> > > family. For now we only support full-duplex.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > Looks very nice overall. Just a few things I noticed, and some ideas
> > that may or may not make sense:
> >
> > > +/* This is defined to 0 on arm64 in arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h but
> > > + * this IP doesn't work without this alignment being equal to 2.
> > > + */
> > > +#ifdef NET_IP_ALIGN
> > > +#undef NET_IP_ALIGN
> > > +#endif
> > > +#define NET_IP_ALIGN 2
> >
> > Maybe you should just define your own macro instead of replacing
> > the normal one then?
> >
>
> I did in an earlier version and was told to use NET_IP_ALIGN but then
> found out its value on arm64 doesn't work for me so I did the thing
> that won't make anybody happy - redefine the existing constant. :)
Hi Bartosz
I did not realise ARM64 set it to 0. As Arnd suggested, please define
your own macro.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists