netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/8 net] the indirect flow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200514.172912.286966851347264575.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 14 May 2020 17:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     pablo@...filter.org
Cc:     ecree@...arflare.com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, paulb@...lanox.com, ozsh@...lanox.com,
        vladbu@...lanox.com, jiri@...nulli.us, kuba@...nel.org,
        saeedm@...lanox.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8 net] the indirect flow_block offload, revisited

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 00:36:27 +0200

> The TC CT action crashes the kernel with an indirect flow_block in place:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/db9dfe4f-62e7-241b-46a0-d878c89696a8@ucloud.cn/

I've read over this patch set at least three times, and reread the
header posting, and there is no clear indication that this patch
series fixes a crash at all.

You need to be explicit about what bug this is fixing, in the commit
messages and introduction posting, with quoted crash logs etc.