netdev - RE: move the SIOCDELRT and SIOCADDRT compat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 16 May 2020 15:04:55 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@....de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: move the SIOCDELRT and SIOCADDRT compat_ioctl handlers v2

From: Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: 15 May 2020 14:19
>
> this series moves the compat_ioctl handlers into the protocol handlers,
> avoiding the need to override the address space limited as in the current
> handler.

Is it worth moving the user copies for the main ioctl buffer
into the sys_ioctl() entry code?
(As is done by the BSD kernels.)

This would allow the compat code to adjust the buffers and pass them on.
Most ioctls don't have indirect data buffers so wouldn't need to
do any further user copies.

This would be, of course, require far more changes (and require
more external modules be fixed) than the similar change I suggested
for [sg]et_sockopt().

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)