[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200518062253.24709cec@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 06:22:53 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the vfs and
net-next trees
On Mon, 18 May 2020 12:30:13 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the jc_docs tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/sysctl.c
>
> between commit:
>
> f461d2dcd511 ("sysctl: avoid forward declarations")
>
> from the vfs tree and commit:
>
> 2f4c33063ad7 ("docs: sysctl/kernel: document ngroups_max")
>
> from the jc_docs tree.
Hmm...that's somewhat messy. I somehow managed to miss the change to
kernel/sysctl.c that doesn't have much to do with documentation. Stephen
(Kitt): I've reverted that change for now. Could I ask you to resubmit it
as two different patches? I'll happily take the actual docs change; the
sysctl change can be sent to the VFS tree on top of the changes there.
In general we really don't want to mix unrelated changes like this.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists