netdev - [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix too large copy from user in bpf_test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 15:05:27 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix too large copy from user in bpf_test_init

Commit bc56c919fce7 ("bpf: Add xdp.frame_sz in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp().")
recently changed bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() to use larger frames for XDP in
order to test tail growing frames (via bpf_xdp_adjust_tail) and to have
memory backing frame better resemble drivers.

The commit contains a bug, as it tries to copy the max data size from
userspace, instead of the size provided by userspace.  This cause XDP
unit tests to fail sporadically with EFAULT, an unfortunate behavior.
The fix is to only copy the size specified by userspace.

Fixes: bc56c919fce7 ("bpf: Add xdp.frame_sz in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp().")
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 30ba7d38941d..bfd4ccd80847 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -160,16 +160,20 @@ static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 size,
 			   u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
 {
 	void __user *data_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.data_in);
+	u32 user_size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
 	void *data;
 
 	if (size < ETH_HLEN || size > PAGE_SIZE - headroom - tailroom)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
+	if (user_size > size)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
+
 	data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
 	if (!data)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	if (copy_from_user(data + headroom, data_in, size)) {
+	if (copy_from_user(data + headroom, data_in, user_size)) {
 		kfree(data);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
 	}
@@ -486,8 +490,6 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 
 	/* XDP have extra tailroom as (most) drivers use full page */
 	max_data_sz = 4096 - headroom - tailroom;
-	if (size > max_data_sz)
-		return -EINVAL;
 
 	data = bpf_test_init(kattr, max_data_sz, headroom, tailroom);
 	if (IS_ERR(data))