netdev - Re: [next-queue RFC 0/4] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <875zcro7tl.fsf@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 15:53:26 -0700
From:   Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To:     Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
        vladimir.oltean@....com, po.liu@....com, m-karicheri2@...com,
        Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [next-queue RFC 0/4] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption

Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com> writes:

>> >
>> >>      active: active
>> >>      supported queues: 0xf
>
> Following the same rationale, is this 'supported queue' going aways as well?
>

I think so, with good error messages, when trying to set an express-only
queue as preemptible, no need to expose this information.


-- 
Vinicius