lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 May 2020 15:53:26 -0700
From:   Vinicius Costa Gomes <>
To:     Andre Guedes <>,
        Michal Kubecek <>,
Subject: Re: [next-queue RFC 0/4] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption

Andre Guedes <> writes:

>> >
>> >>      active: active
>> >>      supported queues: 0xf
> Following the same rationale, is this 'supported queue' going aways as well?

I think so, with good error messages, when trying to set an express-only
queue as preemptible, no need to expose this information.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists