lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 18:23:50 +0300
From:   Danielle Ratson <danieller@...lanox.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        jiri@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, saeedm@...lanox.com, leon@...nel.org,
        snelson@...sando.io, drivers@...sando.io, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: net: Add port split test

On 5/20/2020 4:53 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:43:40PM CEST, idosch@...sch.org wrote:
>> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:33:06PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> It's basically the number of lanes
>>> Then why not call it lanes? It makes it clearer how this maps to the
>>> hardware?
>> I'm not against it. We discussed it and decided to go with width. Jiri /
>> Danielle, are you OK with changing to lanes?
> Sure, no problem.


Hi Andrew,


Maximum number of lanes, is the maximum lanes capacity of the port. 

Besides that, there is the number of utilized lanes, which is the number of lanes that are actually used.


In that patch we expose the maximum number of lanes, and in my opinion "width" describes that better, and "lanes" on the other hand, can refer to both.

Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists