[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200520100218.56e4ee2c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 10:02:18 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
jonathan.lemon@...il.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
maximmi@...lanox.com, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/15] i40e: separate kernel allocated rx_bi
rings from AF_XDP rings
On Wed, 20 May 2020 11:47:34 +0200 Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
>
> Continuing the path to support MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL, the AF_XDP
> zero-copy/sk_buff rx_bi rings are now separate. Functions to properly
> allocate the different rings are added as well.
>
> v3->v4: Made i40e_fd_handle_status() static. (kbuild test robot)
>
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
There is a new warning here, at least one. But i40e has so many
existing warnings with W=1, I can't figure out which one is new :(
You most likely forgot to adjust kdoc somewhere after adding or
removing a function parameter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists