[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4887e5a0858f4bd08734a92d1b8433af@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 15:52:05 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@....de>,
'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] sctp: Pull the user copies out of the individual
sockopt functions.
From: Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: 21 May 2020 16:40
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:37:29PM -0300, 'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:08:13PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> >
> > I wish we could split this patch into multiple ones. Like, one for
> > each sockopt, but it doesn't seem possible. It's tough to traverse
> > trough 5k lines long patch. :-(
>
> I have a series locally that started this, I an try to resurrect and
> finish it.
It is almost better just to look at the new file.
Possibly in a 'side by side' diff.
The only real split is getsockopt v setsockopt.
But they are in separated in the patch anyway.
Most of the patch is just mechanical changes to pass
the compiler and sparse.
Still took over a day to write.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists