lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 15:52:05 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@....de>,
        'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] sctp: Pull the user copies out of the individual
 sockopt functions.

From: Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: 21 May 2020 16:40
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:37:29PM -0300, 'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:08:13PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> >
> > I wish we could split this patch into multiple ones. Like, one for
> > each sockopt, but it doesn't seem possible. It's tough to traverse
> > trough 5k lines long patch. :-(
> 
> I have a series locally that started this, I an try to resurrect and
> finish it.

It is almost better just to look at the new file.
Possibly in a 'side by side' diff.

The only real split is getsockopt v setsockopt.
But they are in separated in the patch anyway.

Most of the patch is just mechanical changes to pass
the compiler and sparse.

Still took over a day to write.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists