lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 19:43:58 +0200
From:   "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
        "sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
        "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "galpress@...zon.com" <galpress@...zon.com>,
        "selvin.xavier@...adcom.com" <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
        "sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com" 
        <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>,
        "benve@...co.com" <benve@...co.com>,
        "bharat@...lsio.com" <bharat@...lsio.com>,
        "xavier.huwei@...wei.com" <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        "mkalderon@...vell.com" <mkalderon@...vell.com>,
        "aditr@...are.com" <aditr@...are.com>,
        "ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com" 
        <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com" 
        <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@...el.com>,
        Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 01/12] Implementation of Virtual Bus

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:57:55PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi Greg, Jason,
> 
> On 5/20/2020 12:32 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
> > 
> 
> > +static const
> > +struct virtbus_dev_id *virtbus_match_id(const struct virtbus_dev_id *id,
> > +					struct virtbus_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > +	while (id->name[0]) {
> > +		if (!strcmp(vdev->match_name, id->name))
> > +			return id;
> 
> Should we have VID, DID based approach instead of _any_ string chosen by
> vendor drivers?

No, because:

> This will required central place to define the VID, DID of the vdev in
> vdev_ids.h to have unique ids.

That's not a good way to run things :)

Have the virtbus core create the "name", as it really doesn't matter
what it is, just that it is unique, right?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists